Can Social Media take the role of media proper?

The growth of the internet has changed things a lot. Today, social media offers us almost instant access to whatever content interests us whenever we want it. We can get instant updates on the latest news, instead of waiting for a publication to “go to press”. These, no doubt, are the good things we can hope to derive from social media.

Who could have imagined — not long ago but little over a decade — that the term social media would intrude into our lives to become an essential appendage to almost all our social and even personal behaviours? Like a hungry tide from nowhere, it swooped in to take millions of people on an incessant ride on its waves. The curious part is that unlike the print media, it is more direct, more instant, more entertaining and at the same time wobbly (because of the wave!)

Entertainment indeed comes first and with it freedom. This is because the platform comprising Facebook, Twitter and Youtube, to name the three most predominant tools, is informal, privately operated. Hence, it’s not free from biases, idiosyncrasies of individuals handling it at their sweet will. Initially, the focus was to socialise through virtual presence, and the tendency was to let others know about themselves, not just in an informative sense, but mostly about their fetish for self-love, their narcissism, achievements, even vainglories.

Over time, this self-love got compounded with their likes and dislikes, at times strong opinions on things happening around them or elsewhere — with no boundaries whatsoever. Obviously, it was the facebook — thanks to the groundbreaking ingenuity of Mark E. Zuckerberg — which hit the ground like no other communicative device ever conceived by the human brain to have billions across the globe glued to their cell phones. In no time, Youtube, an almost unthinkable tool for social communication, offered individuals the ease to express their feelings freely, fearlessly — albeit subjectively. It is this subjectivity that essentially defines social media.

We all rely on the media ( print or electronic) to tell us what is going on globally. It is the journalists that tell us about world events, news, politics, and the latest trends. Until recently, newspapers and print magazines were a vital source of information — be that editorials, opinion pieces, news, or information.

The growth of the internet has changed things a lot. Today, social media offers us almost instant access to whatever content interests us whenever we want it. We can get instant updates on the latest news, instead of waiting for a publication to “go to press”. These, no doubt, are the good things we can hope to derive from social media.

In that sense, social media appears to have changed the core of journalism. In some ways, yes. Now, breaking news can be reported on as it happens. If there’s a huge event at 2 AM, people can find out about it immediately, instead of waiting for the newspapers to be delivered hours later. If there’s a rapidly changing issue, say, of the outgoing US President announcing a barricade around the White House in the middle of the night to stop the President-elect from entering, or a sudden development concerning  Brexit, then there can be hourly updates on the social media.

But the fact remains that updates or breaking news are not all. There are things at the background– the information is often hidden that need to be unearthed to render the update meaningful. This clearly is not on the agenda of people running social media.

On the other hand, misinformation can do a lot of damage. Rumours on social media are not at all uncommon.

There can be no denying that social media does present some challenges for those who want to consume quality news. Firstly, since anyone can post on social media, it is hard to be sure that the information presented is accurate. Secondly, even the content creator aims to produce quality journalism on social media, he/she is under a lot of pressure to “be the first” to break the news. Journalists, on the other hand, are taught to verify their sources, to be unbiased, and to think critically and objectively. Fact-checking and balance-maintaining are at the core of responsible journalism. Not sensitising.

People worldwide are too busy, and many, including the young and the adults, tend not to spend time on the details of a news item published in newspapers. A quick solution for many of them is to browse the net, but what they miss out in the process is the untold story behind the news. While social media is good for simulating debates, there is still value in having detailed articles, long documentaries and thoughtful discussion, and those are the things that social media lacks. Social media may be faster and cheaper, but those things come at the expense of quality.

Some people think social media is challenging print media.  The answer is — if those who want print media to remain relevant, they need to find ways to differentiate themselves with more and more proactive endeavours. As of now, there is no visible sign to indicate that social media despite its growing vigour and strength, is potentially capable of being a substitute to print or electronic media.

 

Cover image source: Internet

 

Wasi Ahmed, a novelist, short story writer, and journalist, lives in Dhaka.

 

More Posts From this Author:

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

শুদ্ধস্বর
Translate »
error: Content is protected !!
Scroll to Top